英語魂EIGODAMASHII
止まらない英語を、ここから。
設定
← ホームに戻る
← DMM 一覧
id: v7SidXLhsLTk

宇宙探査の英作文を音読＋2分スピーチ — fence-sitting指導

2026-06-30講師: DMM (Cape Town)25 分9 ターン
英検ライトパス Day1(Is space exploration worth the cost?)の模範解答を手書き書き写し→講師の前で音読→Yes/No各2分スピーチ。講師フィードバック: ブレスト→整理、序論本論結論、fence-sitting厳禁。
今表示中のチャンク全部を /english/training に登録。
あとで一覧画面で要らないものを削除する運用。
生徒 5 / 講師 4 ・ NATIVE化 5/5 ・ ENGAGED化 5/5 ・ chunk = 3文ずつ
NATIVE
俺の表現の修正
自然な native 口語 + 一言しゃれた表現。 明日の自分が言えるべきレベル。
ENGAGED
本物の会話の深さ
punchline じゃない。 逆質問・vulnerability・具体的 observation・pushback。 本気で engaged な native conversationalist が同じトピックでどう返すか。
TEACHER
講師の native 表現
講師は本物の native。 各 chunk をそのまま素材として登録 = pure native input。
振り返りレポート
脳内の意図 ↔ 口から出た英語の乖離。短SVOで連射しろ。
バグ図鑑（横断ウォッチ）→
教材の英作文(Is space exploration worth the cost?)を音読し、2分スピーチに挑戦した回。最大の課題は fence-sitting=賛否を併記して着地しないこと。立場は一つに決め、反対側は結論前に Admittedly ... but on balance ... で一文だけ。文法では I'm agree、動詞の言い直しが再発。次回は 立場1つ・理由2つ・2分以内 を厳守する。
致命的乖離 — 思考をダウングレードして短SVO連射
自分の意見を2分で述べる
崩壊“My stance is 50/50, I don't wanna say no or yes... (4分間、賛否を行き来して着地しない)”
意図一方の立場を選び、2分で理由2つに絞って言い切る
タップで登録
AIに模範解答を作らせた経緯を説明
崩壊“I actually made, had AI write a perfect answer”
意図I had AI write a model answer.
タップで登録
賛成の立場を述べる
崩壊“So I'm agree with space exploration because...”
意図I agree with space exploration because...
タップで登録
繰り返し文法バグ（記録と照合・再発を追跡）
be動詞+動詞agreeの重複。agreeは動詞なのでbe不要
I'm agree with space exploration→I agree with space exploration
動詞の言い直し(made/had)が残り主動詞が不明瞭
I actually made, had AI write a perfect answer→I had AI write a model answer
主語が落ちて節が崩れる
we are far behind, almost don't know anything→we are so far behind that we know almost nothing about it
ネイティブらしくない癖（would 回避・over-hedge 等）
癖両論併記(fence-sitting)で中立に逃げ、立場を一つに決めない
native一方に立ち、結論の前に Admittedly ..., but on balance ... で一文だけ譲歩する
声帯ドリル任意のお題で I firmly believe ___ / 理由2つ / Admittedly ___, but on balance ___ を10本、口頭で
癖you know / how to say / uh のフィラー連発で文が間延びする
native沈黙を恐れず Let me think for a moment. と一言置いてから話し出す
声帯ドリル2分スピーチを録音し、フィラーを数えて次回に半減させる
  1. #1
    8分
    生徒 (とにお)
    Today I wanna focus on the Eiken exam. I actually had AI write a perfect answer for the writing test, and it's a past exam topic. I was bad at English, especially writing, and I haven't written by hand, so I have to rehabilitate myself.
    NATIVE俺の表現の修正chunk 1/1
    Today I'd like to focus on the Eiken. I had AI write a model answer for the writing section using a past topic, and I'm copying it out by hand. I'm honestly rusty at writing, so I'm easing myself back into it.
    ENGAGED本物の会話の深さchunk 1/1
    So my plan is a bit unusual. I'm not writing from scratch yet, I'm hand-copying an AI model answer to rebuild the muscle memory. Does that sound like a sensible warm-up, or am I just dodging the hard part?
  2. #2
    講師
    TEACHER講師の native 表現chunk 1/2
    One of the first things to do with something like this is to jot down notes, to brainstorm. Write down every idea that comes to you in single words. Then take those words, make short notes, organize them, and decide what you'll start with and how you'll develop it.
    TEACHER講師の native 表現chunk 2/2
    Otherwise you tend to be very scattered, piecemeal.
  3. #3
    11分
    生徒 (とにお)
    Maybe I skipped the brainstorming part. My brain is racing and wants to go straight into the topic, so there is no organizing part. I have to take a step back and brainstorm first.
    NATIVE俺の表現の修正chunk 1/1
    I think I skip the brainstorming. My brain races straight into writing, so I never organize my thoughts first. I need to slow down and jot ideas before I write.
    ENGAGED本物の会話の深さchunk 1/1
    That's exactly my weak spot. I dive in mid-thought and the essay ends up scattered. If I forced myself to spend even one minute on notes first, do you think my writing speed would actually go up rather than down?
  4. #4
    講師
    TEACHER講師の native 表現chunk 1/1
    You can easily organize it into an introduction, your main points, and a conclusion.
  5. #5
    14:00–16:00
    REC
    生徒 (とにお)
    Can you give me a two or three minute monologue, your take on this topic, in a no position? The AI wrote the yes position.
    NATIVE俺の表現の修正chunk 1/1
    Could you give me a two-minute monologue on this topic, taking the 'no' side? The AI answer already covers 'yes'.
    ENGAGED本物の会話の深さchunk 1/1
    I'd love to hear a model done live. Take the 'no' side, two minutes, no interruptions. I'll record it and shadow it afterwards, so feel free to go a touch slower than natural.
  6. #6
    16:00–18:00
    講師
    TEACHER講師の native 表現chunk 1/2
    If we look at the huge costs, so many aspects of daily life need far more funding, particularly combating climate change, developing agriculture, and the supply of fresh water, which is often thought of as the next thing a world war would be fought over. A few very rich people are pouring money into space exploration, while governments fight so much over budgets that I don't see them funding it on that level. The benefits are obvious, but cleaning up our own planet, sorting out the mess we're in, is more important for our survival.
    TEACHER講師の native 表現chunk 2/2
    That would be my argument against.
  7. #7
    18:00–20:00
    REC
    生徒 (とにお)
    1/2My stance is 50/50. I don't wanna say no or yes. Let me start with the yes answer, because we don't know about the universe and there's so much potential, and it ignites our curiosity.
    2/2And I will say the no answer, because we haven't solved wars or water shortages yet.
    NATIVE俺の表現の修正chunk 1/1
    I firmly believe space exploration is worth the cost, for two main reasons. First, it drives technology with huge potential benefits for humanity. Second, it answers a curiosity that is part of human nature.
    ENGAGED本物の会話の深さchunk 1/1
    My gut says it's worth it, but let me argue the harder side first: even if exploration inspires us, can we justify the budget while basic problems like clean water go unsolved? I'll still commit to 'yes', and that tension is exactly what makes the topic interesting.
  8. #8
    20:00–23:00
    講師
    TEACHER講師の native 表現chunk 1/3
    I'm going to stop you there, because you've talked for four minutes and you went around ideas a lot. On this sort of answer you can't give a yes and no. They will mark you down very much if you try to sit on the fence.
    TEACHER講師の native 表現chunk 2/3
    You've got to choose one. You can say at the end, 'it must be admitted that there are negative sides to this, such as... ', but 'in general I feel that the positives outweigh the negatives.
    TEACHER講師の native 表現chunk 3/3
    ' You can't fence-sit.
  9. #9
    23分
    生徒 (とにお)
    I want to graduate from this broken English. I usually speak casually and ramble, which is fun, but I don't want to be stuck with broken English forever. This structured format is good training.
    NATIVE俺の表現の修正chunk 1/1
    I want to graduate from broken English. I usually ramble casually, which is fun, but I don't want to be stuck there forever. This structured format is good training for me.
    ENGAGED本物の会話の深さchunk 1/1
    Casual rambling is my comfort zone, but it's also a trap. Could we make these structured two-minute drills a regular thing, and would you push me harder each round, even when it gets uncomfortable?