LESSON ・会話 + 検死 + 解説

★★★本題 — 模範解答を読む男と、模範解答に本音で返す講師と、第3の聞き手の AI。男は疲れていて、自分の意見を作らず、英検1級二次の公式模範解答(2024年、5題)を1本ずつ朗読して、講師の反応を引き出した。「今日はずるをする。自分の意見は言わない。あなたと AI を同時に相手にしている(I'm talking to you and AI at the same time)。あなたの言葉も模範解答も、両方盗む」。講師は5題すべてに即興で自分の立場を置いた — CEO 報酬: 上を下げるな、下を上げろ(pay the lower-level workers more rather than pay the CEO less)。個人と政治: Rosa Parks は法を変えた、スターは政治家より影響力がある、本当に選挙を決めるのはソロスやシュワブの資金とロビー(they 100% control the influence)。サイバー: スペインとフランスの動機なき攻撃(子どもが AI でいたずら、冷凍庫を止めて火事)、デジタル化と同じ速度でセキュリティを上げなかった(in line with their digitalization)。哲学: 歴史は繰り返す、ギリシャ人の方が今の学者より高い所にいた、世界は妙なリセットを経た、プラトンの『国家』の原則(政治家が儲けるな)を今も誰も実装していない、public servant が self-serving になった、全員が reining it in(私腹を肥やしている)。自然保護: 反対 — 産業化は世界に恩恵をもたらした、主権国家の土地に口を出すな、NGO の金は行方不明、EU の規制で十分。男はここで封印を破った — EU は左に行きすぎ、strike a balance、the truth is in the middle always。第137夜に make a balance と崩れた定型が、9日後に立った。講師は EU 在住(here in the EU)、10/12 に男が飛ばした授業の相手。名前は録音に無い。男は最後に「次回はオンラインのオフィスから、結果を面白い形で見せる。驚くよ」と予告した。以下は、その25分の内訳である。朗読した模範解答は1段落1行に畳み、骨(型)だけを抜いた。

2026-10-1625 分

検死レポート（ノイズ＝直すべき癖）

第139夜。本題 — 模範解答を読む男と、模範解答に本音で返す講師と、第3の聞き手の AI。本人は疲れていて自分の意見を作らず、英検1級二次の公式模範解答(2024年、5題)を朗読して講師の反応を引き出した。「今日はずるをする、意見は言わない、あなたと AI を同時に相手にしている、両方から盗む」。講師(EU 在住、10/12 の無断欠席の相手、名前は録音に無い)は5題すべてに即興で立場を置いた — CEO: 下げるな、下を上げろ。個人と政治: Parks は法を変えた、スターは政治家より強い、本当に決めるのはソロス・シュワブの資金とロビー。サイバー: 動機なき攻撃(子どもが AI でいたずら、冷凍庫を止めて火事)、デジタル化と同じ速度でセキュリティを上げなかった。哲学: 歴史は繰り返す、ギリシャ人の方が上、妙なリセット、『国家』の原則を誰も実装していない、全員 raking it in。自然保護: 反対 — 産業化は世界に恩恵、主権国家に口を出すな、NGO の金は行方不明、EU の規制で十分。本人は5題目で封印を破った — EU は左に行きすぎ、strike a balance(第137夜の make a balance から9日)、the truth is in the middle always。文法の崩れは本人の発話が少ない分だけ少ないが、前夜の宿題①(I'm + 動詞)が2回 FAILED(I'm not comment / I'm kind of disagree — 講師の I kind of disagree を10秒後に be 付きで復唱)、今朝の書き取りカード What are your thoughts on が同日 what's your thoughts、後悔の仮定法が現在形(I wish I wrote / I will definitely first)、朗読の狙撃7発(war or / ever / regions / differently / operations / product / has been)。前夜の宿題は ①FAILED ×2 ②NO_CHANCE ③NO_CHANCE。本人は次回、オフィスから画面共有で「結果」を見せると予告した。

ネイティブらしくない癖

疲れた夜は、自分の意見を作らず模範解答を朗読して講師の本音を引き出す。維持する(5本の2分スピーチの見本が取れた) → 1本読んだら必ず What are your thoughts on this? で止める。講師の立場を1文で復唱してから次へ

講師の正しい文を10秒後に復唱して、be を1枚足す(I kind of disagree → I'm kind of disagree) → 復唱は1語も変えない。I kind of の前に I'm は無い

当日の朝に登録したカードは、夜に金具が1つ動いて出る(set in his ways / What are your thoughts on) → 朝のカードは、核の語より隣の1語(are / in)を口に出してから入る

印刷された英語を読むと1音ずれる(第138夜10発、今夜7発)。在庫に無い語の密度に比例する → 読む前に知らない語に印。reasons / definitely / purification は1音ずつ

講師の話に、1段上の例を乗せる(スターが政治家を使う → スター本人が出る、Trump)。維持する → 講師の例を聞いたら、同じ軸で1段上の例を1つ返す

宣言と立場は短く立ち(I'm going to cheat / The truth is in the middle)、説明は伸びて崩れる(模範解答の出どころの段落) → 説明は1文10語。出どころ・理由・作戦は3文に割る

乖離（短いSVOで言い切る練習）

今日はずるをする。自分の意見は言わない。あなたと AI を同時に相手にしている: I'm going to cheat today. I'm not going to comment with my own opinion. / My brain is fried. / I'm talking to you and AI at the same time.

EU は左に行きすぎ。バランスを取れ。真実は真ん中(封印破り): I kind of disagree with what they're doing in the EU. It's too progressive. / You have to strike a balance. The truth is always in the middle.

2年前の二次で同じお題が出た。この答えなら受かっていた: I wish I had given this answer that day, instead of my elementary-school English. / If I had, I'd definitely have passed.

模範解答の出どころと、今日の作戦の説明: There are model answers for each topic. You know what I mean? / I want to read them out loud as much as possible and go through all five topics.

あなたの話を聞いているだけでいい。両方から盗む: I could just listen to you. I don't have to say anything. / I'll steal from both you and the model answers.

次回はオフィスから画面共有で結果を見せる: I hope I'll be in the office next time, so I can share my screen and show you the results.

生徒Hello. Hey, hello. ... Yes, and uh, and uh. I have a eh trying to prepare, prepare for my testing exam again. Today, okay? And uh, but uh, you know, sorry about last time, maybe if you remember, I totally mixed up. Mixing thing, but. I, I, I got, I got the time wrong. Totally wrong, you know. I when I, you know, okay, yeah, eh let's, let's chat, you know. I opened uh us and uh oh, the lesson already finished. Sorry about.

ネイティブなら

I'm trying to prepare for my speaking exam again today. And sorry about last time. I totally mixed up the time. I got the time wrong. When I opened the app, the lesson had already finished. Sorry about that.

解説

☓I have a eh trying to prepare → I'M trying to prepare。☓testing exam → SPEAKING exam。☓I opened us → I opened the APP。☓the lesson already finished → the lesson HAD already finished(開いた時点より前)。☓Sorry about. → Sorry about THAT。

★39夜目の入口は謝罪。10/12 に飛ばした授業(第136夜で「昨日の授業を飛ばした」と言ったのがこの講師)の謝罪から入った。★got the time wrong(時間を間違えた)は立った。☓prepare の前の be が無く、試験が testing exam になり、開けたのが us(アプリ)だった。

先生What, what, what, what did you mean? Do you open something or you want, you wanted to start? ... Did you miss one? That's possible. Ah, well, maybe at the weekend or something? On Monday? Uh either way, I mean, I remember the last lesson ... But maybe, maybe there was a day that you missed the class, yeah. Anyway, don't worry, don't worry about it. It's uh no skin off my back, to be honest. If you miss a lesson, it's uh yeah, no show, yes. Sorry, it it it had gone out of my mind, to be honest. I was thinking of the one, the lesson before.

解説

★★講師は無断欠席を覚えていなかった — 「それは可能性がある、週末か、月曜か」。そして no skin off my back(痛くも痒くもない)。講師が覚えていない欠席を、男が謝った。

盗む

It's no skin off my back, to be honest.

「俺には何の実害もない=気にするな」= no skin off my back(米は off my nose)。相手の謝罪を受け流す1文。it had gone out of my mind = すっかり忘れていた。no-show = 無断欠席。

先生Uh the previous one. But okay, so, yeah, well, don't worry, it happens. You mistook the time. Uh happens to the best of us. So, yeah, don't worry about it. It's no like massive inconvenience for me.

解説

★講師の3段 — it happens / happens to the best of us / no massive inconvenience。謝罪を3回、違う語で受けた。

盗む

It happens. Happens to the best of us.

「誰にでもある」= happens to the best of us(最高の人間にも起きる)。相手のミスを軽くする定型。massive inconvenience = 大きな迷惑。

先生It's gone quiet now, though. I can't hear you now. ... Now, now I can hear you, yeah. Well, anyway, apology uh thank you for the apology. That's polite. Uh for missing it. Some other some people might not bother saying anything about it, you know. Um, but I always say that. My my students sometimes get annoyed with the teachers if they come late or something, but they don't say sorry, but it it it it's uh common courtesy, please and thank you. And sorry. It's the respectful way of uh dealing with it.

解説

★★講師は謝罪そのものを評価した — 「謝らない人もいる。please と thank you と sorry は common courtesy(最低限の礼儀)」。

盗む

Some people might not bother saying anything about it. It's common courtesy.

「わざわざ〜しない人もいる」= might not bother -ing。common courtesy = 最低限の礼儀。礼を言われた側が、礼の価値を言い返す形。

生徒Yes. Wait a minute. Ah maybe, yeah. Can you hear me? Can you hear me? ... So, my, so, and uh I'm a bit tired, and uh so there's uh uh like model answer each of the topics. Uh you know me? Like maybe native English speakers like you know write about. You know, in it can spend, you know, days to you know to write about this, so perfect answer. So, I think it's beneficial for me to read about the model answers, and uh.

ネイティブなら

I'm a bit tired today, so I brought model answers for each topic. You know what I mean? Native speakers wrote them, probably over days, so they're perfect answers. I think it's beneficial for me to read the model answers out loud.

解説

☓model answer each of the topics → model answers FOR each topic。☓you know me? → you know what I MEAN?☓read about the model answers → READ the model answers (out loud)。read about は「〜についての記事を読む」。

★★今夜の作戦の宣言 — 疲れているので、自分で意見を作らず、模範解答を読む。☓「俺を知ってる?」と聞いた(you know what I mean? のつもり)。☓模範解答「について」読む、になった。

先生Where, where, where did they come from, the model answers? Is it from the exam preparation thing? ... Yeah, I know, I know, I know what you mean, that that the actual um examining body provide that model answer.

解説

★講師の確認 — 出どころは試験団体か。examining body = 試験実施団体。

盗む

The actual examining body provides that model answer.

試験を作る団体 = examining body。英検協会・IELTS の運営はこれ。「公式の」は the actual。

生徒Yes, and not AI wrote, you know, I do, I guess. Maybe two years ago, uh 2024, I'm kind of like uh referring to, and uh five topics, and uh so, it's good, it's great for me to read out loud as possible. It's English lesson, and uh maybe I will bore you to death, maybe 5 minutes or 6 minutes. I're I'm kind of like uh I want to like go through every five topics and uh every model answers. Is that okay? And uh it's recorded, you know, so I can read and I will ask AI afterwards to kind of like uh be careful with expression, good expression kind of things.

ネイティブなら

Yes, and AI didn't write them. I'm referring to the 2024 ones, five topics. It's great for me to read them out loud as much as possible. I may bore you to death for five or six minutes. I want to go through all five topics and all the model answers. Is that okay? It's recorded, so afterwards I'll ask AI to pick out the good expressions.

解説

☓not AI wrote → AI DIDN'T write them。☓read out loud as possible → as MUCH as possible。☓every five topics / every model answers → ALL five topics / all the model answers。every の後ろは単数。☓be careful with expression → PICK OUT the good expressions。

★★★bore you to death(退屈で殺す)が立った — 第138夜に講師から聞いた hammered to death / beaten to death と同じ to death の型を、24時間後に自分の文で。★そして「録音している、後で AI に表現を拾わせる」— 第138夜の宣言の続き。☓every の後ろに複数が2回。

生徒So, the four five uh questions, I know we're going to, you know, after that we're going to, you know, go deep into the topic, each topic until the end. So, uh one. Are the high compensation packages for CEOs at large corporations warranted? ... Number two. Can the actions of individuals ever contribute significantly to political change? And three. Should improving cybersecurity It's funny, because that was my last exam, you know, is it topic, but uh two years ago already, you know, speaking exam, they said, they mentioned, should improving cybersecurity measures be the highest priority for government agencies? And number four. Does the study of philosophy have any relevance in today's society? And finally. Five, uh I agree or disagree. Wealthy countries should fund efforts to preserve natural areas around the world.

ネイティブなら

After each one, we'll go deep into the topic. One: Are the high compensation packages for CEOs at large corporations warranted? Two: Can the actions of individuals ever contribute significantly to political change? Three: Should improving cybersecurity measures be the highest priority for government agencies? It's funny, that was the topic on my last speaking exam, two years ago. Four: Does the study of philosophy have any relevance in today's society? Five, agree or disagree: Wealthy countries should fund efforts to preserve natural areas around the world.

解説

☓that was my last exam, is it topic → that was the TOPIC on my last exam。

★5題の読み上げ。3題目(サイバーセキュリティ)は2年前の本人の二次のお題だった。★go deep into the topic — 第138夜の go deep の再登場。

豆知識

英検1級二次は、5つのトピックカードから1つ選び、1分の準備で2分のスピーチ、そのあと質疑。今夜の5題は2024年度の公式の模範解答付きのもの。模範解答の型は「立場 → 理由3つ(I'll discuss A, B, and C)→ 結論」。

生徒[模範解答1・CEO 報酬 — 朗読] I believe high compensation packages for CEOs at large corporations are justified. I'll discuss attracting top talent, incentives to perform well, and responsibility. The most obvious reason is that competitive salaries are essential to get the best CEOs. ... Therefore, companies need to pay huge salaries to attract CEOs who can come up with innovative and practical business strategies. Then once the CEO has been hired, there has to be an incentive to perform well. While multi-million-dollar salaries may seem like a lot of money, CEOs' compensation is often linked to performance. ... Finally, let's consider responsibility. CEOs carry an incredibly heavy burden. Their decisions affect thousands of workers and involve choices that can make or break the company. It is only fair that they be fairly compensated for the extreme pressure of their jobs. In conclusion, when you look at how important it is to attract the best people, give them incentives, and reward them for their responsibility, it's clear that high compensation packages for CEOs are appropriate.

ネイティブなら

(朗読) there has to be an incentive to perform well

解説

☓there has been an incentive → there has TO BE an incentive。朗読で has to be が has been に。

★模範解答1の骨 — I believe ~ are justified / I'll discuss A, B, and C / The most obvious reason is that / Therefore / Then once ~ / While ~ may seem like / Finally, let's consider / It is only fair that they be ~ / In conclusion, when you look at how ~, it's clear that ~。盗む句 — come up with innovative and practical strategies / carry an incredibly heavy burden / make or break the company / fairly compensated。

豆知識

It is only fair that they BE compensated — that 節の中が原形(仮定法現在)。fair / essential / important that の後ろは、米語では原形、英語では should + 原形。模範解答は米語の形。

生徒Okay, let's stop. Uh what do you what what what's your thoughts on this? Maybe let me stop.

ネイティブなら

Okay, let me stop there. What are your thoughts on this?

解説

☓what's your thoughts → what ARE your thoughts。thoughts は複数。06-28 / 07-11 に落とし、今朝(10/16)の書き取りカード(What are your thoughts on the new tax legislation?)に登録した席で、同じ日の夜に落ちた。

☓今朝のカードが、同じ日の夜に外れた。What are your thoughts on は 10/16 の書き取りの1本。12時間後、what's your thoughts。第137夜の set in his ways(同日のカード、金具がずれた)と同じ現象。

先生I mean, I guess it seems kind of unreasonable when you compare the the the salary of the top CEO in a like huge corporation to the lowest level worker, it does kind of seem unfair, but I don't think that um I think the the uh model answer makes a good point in terms of how much have they actually contributed in terms of real effect on the strategy of the business or something. And the profits and all of the good that that provides in terms of providing jobs for people. So, yeah, I don't think that they uh I think paying the CEO that much is fine, depending on the profit margin or the success of the business, how well the business is doing, but um they should maybe pay the lower level workers more rather than pay the CEO less. If that makes sense.

解説

★★★講師の立場1 — 格差は不公平に見えるが、模範解答の言い分(貢献)は正しい。CEO の給料は利益率次第で構わない。下げるのではなく、下を上げろ。二元論を外す1文。

盗む

They should pay the lower-level workers more rather than pay the CEO less.

「A を減らすより B を増やせ」= do B more rather than do A less。AかBかの二択を外す型。depending on the profit margin = 利益率次第で。if that makes sense = 伝わっていれば。

生徒Ah, yeah. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Thank you so much. And uh, you know, I'm going to uh cheat, you know. Today, I I'm not comment my own opinion. My brain is really fast. So, next month. Focus on model one, yeah, it's fine. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. And uh, you know, let's, you know, AI listen to this and uh I'm, you know, I I'm counting on you and AI. So, I'm talking to you and AI at the same time.

ネイティブなら

I'm going to cheat today. I'm not going to comment with my own opinion. My brain is fried. Next month. Let's focus on the model answers. AI will listen to this later. I'm counting on you and AI. I'm talking to you and AI at the same time.

解説

☓I'm not comment → I'm not GOING TO comment / I won't comment。前夜の宿題①(I'm の後ろに動詞)が、そのまま FAILED。☓My brain is really fast → my brain is FRIED / not working。速い、と言った。言いたいのは動かない。

★★★今夜の線の1文 — I'm talking to you and AI at the same time。第138夜の「録音されていて、明日も同じことが起きる」の次の段で、男は講師の前で AI を第3の聞き手に指名した。☓I'm not comment — 第138夜の宿題①(I'm listened / I'm enjoy)が24時間で再発。☓そして脳が「速い」。第136夜の my brain works is always right(脳は正しい)と同じ、疲れた脳の自己申告。

生徒[模範解答2・個人と政治 — 朗読] Can the actions of individuals ever contribute significantly to political change? I definitely agree that the actions of individuals can contribute significantly to political change. First of all, there are many examples of individuals who changed the course of history. Probably the most famous is Rosa Parks. Do you know Rosa Parks? ... when she refused to give up her seat to a white person on the bus, it was the trigger for the civil rights movement that helped millions of black citizens get better treatment. Second, participating in political campaigns can make a huge difference. Recently, there have been many elections that were extremely close. Individual efforts to change other people's minds can have a real effect on the outcomes because just a few votes can make the difference between victory and defeat. Finally, online personalities known as influencers have become very important in modern society. As the name suggests, influencers have a tremendous amount of power to influence people, and this often pertains to their ability to affect politics, too. ... While it can be hard to imagine a single individual contributing to political change, I think the reasons I have outlined show that individuals can definitely have a major impact.

解説

★模範解答2の骨 — I definitely agree that / First of all, there are many examples of / Probably the most famous is / Second / Finally / As the name suggests / While it can be hard to imagine ~, I think the reasons I have outlined show that ~。盗む句 — changed the course of history / refused to give up her seat / the trigger for / make a huge difference / extremely close / make the difference between victory and defeat / a tremendous amount of power / pertains to。★朗読の途中で Do you know Rosa Parks? と講師に振った。

豆知識

Rosa Parks(1913-2005)は1955年、アラバマ州モンゴメリーのバスで白人に席を譲ることを拒否して逮捕された。これが381日間のバス・ボイコットと公民権運動の引き金になった。模範解答の the trigger for はこの史実。

生徒So, what do you think? I heard, you know, I I, yeah, I heard your, you know, your stance. You said, uh I really remember, you know, maybe you agree this idea. But uh. What's, you know, how how should.

ネイティブなら

So, what do you think? I remember your stance on this. You probably agree with this idea.

解説

☓agree this idea → agree WITH this idea。agree の後ろの with。

★「あなたの立場は覚えている」— 前の夜(10/12 より前)にこの講師と政治の話をしていた記録が、本人の口から。☓agree の with が落ちた。

先生Ah, I I I agree with what they say about um ordinary citizens potentially, I mean, it might be unlikely or the amount of influence might be less if they're just an ordinary person, but the Rosa Parks is a pretty clear example. ... I don't know if that impacted an election per se, but it definitely uh changed some policy and some, yes. Uh changing of bringing in new laws or something in America. So, anyway, it's a good example of a normal citizen influencing a big political change, let's say, rather than an election result.

解説

★講師の立場2(前半) — 普通の市民の影響は小さいかもしれないが、Rosa Parks は明確な例。選挙ではなく、法を変えた。

盗む

I don't know if that impacted an election per se, but it definitely changed some policy.

「〜そのものではないが」= per se(ラテン語、それ自体は)。A ではないが B、と範囲を限る時の1語。bring in new laws = 法律を作る。let's say = 言ってみれば。

先生Yeah, I feel like um even um sometimes big stars and celebrities, nowadays this could be an online personality or something who were well known all over the world. Sometimes they have more influence than the politicians themselves, because people are not listening to everything that they say. So, a lot of the times when the politicians are on a campaign, they try and bring in some pop stars or something to try and attract a younger audience. And and it's obviously does have some impact um on the vote, I'd imagine.

解説

★講師の立場2(中) — スターは政治家より影響力がある。政治家は選挙でポップスターを呼んで若い票を取る。

盗む

Sometimes they have more influence than the politicians themselves.

「〜自身より」= than ~ themselves。比較の相手を強める。bring in pop stars to attract a younger audience = 若い層を引き込むためにスターを呼ぶ。I'd imagine = だと思う(断定を避ける)。

生徒Yes, and uh just stage just uh. ... Yeah, or the stars themselves just uh running for, yeah, president or something. Donald Trump is uh you know, like a good example, right? Because he was he was famous and uh influencers and, the next one, sorry. Number three, should um

ネイティブなら

Or the stars themselves run for president. Donald Trump is a good example, right? He was famous, an influencer. Next one, sorry. Number three.

解説

☓he was famous and influencers → he was famous, AN INFLUENCER。単数。

★★スターが政治家を使うのではなく、スターが自分で出る — Trump を1語で足した。講師の話に、1段上の例を乗せた(第137夜の Mob mentality、第138夜の beating a dead horse と同じ型)。

先生On a on a on a higher level, you've got, you know, like people like Klaus Schwab and um George Soros and stuff, and they can 100% determine an election with their funding. And even just normal big businesses with their lobbying and stuff, they 100% control the influence, the Well, very powerful influence.

解説

★★★講師の立場2(後半) — 本当に選挙を決める個人は、ソロスやシュワブの資金と、大企業のロビー。模範解答の influencer の1段上。

盗む

They can 100% determine an election with their funding.

「完全に〜できる」= can 100% + 動詞(口語の強め)。on a higher level = もう1段上の話では。lobbying = ロビー活動。

豆知識

Klaus Schwab は世界経済フォーラム(ダボス会議)の創設者、George Soros は投資家で民主党系の大口献金者。講師はこの2人を「資金で選挙を決める個人」の例に出した。評価は講師の立場で、事実としては、米国の選挙資金は2010年の Citizens United 判決以降、上限なしの献金(スーパー PAC)が可能になっている。

生徒Uh-huh, yes. Yeah, yeah, yeah. I'm going to steal your words, and. [模範解答3・サイバーセキュリティ — 朗読] Should improving cybersecurity measures be the highest priority for government agencies? Cybersecurity is vital to government agencies, and I strongly believe that enhancing it should be their highest priority. Although government agencies do a lot of essential work, nothing is as urgent as the threat of hackers. If, for example, hackers from a terrorist organization got into the computer systems of water purification plants, dam and flood control systems, or traffic control systems, it could lead to societal chaos and significant loss of life. Therefore, security systems must be upgraded as soon as possible. Second, data leaks are an extremely serious problem. Government computers contain confidential information about every citizen in the country. If this were to fall into the hands of hackers, the information would certainly be misused, resulting in the public's loss of trust in the government. Third, protecting government data is a matter of national security. If foreign nations discover a nation's military secrets, it could allow them to launch attacks on the country. Furthermore, leaks of advanced military technology could change the balance of power in other parts of the world as well. For these reasons, it's clear that governments need to urgently upgrade their cybersecurity.

ネイティブなら

(朗読) water purification plants / every citizen / For these reasons

解説

☓war or purification plants → WATER purification plants。☓the ever citizen → EVERY citizen。☓For those for these regions → For these REASONS。理由が地域になった。

★★I'm going to steal your words — 第138夜の I want to steal に続いて、今夜は講師に向かって「あなたの言葉を盗む」。★模範解答3の骨 — I strongly believe that / Although ~ do a lot of essential work, nothing is as urgent as / If, for example, ~ got into ~, it could lead to / Therefore / Second / If this were to fall into the hands of / resulting in / Third, ~ is a matter of national security / Furthermore / For these reasons, it's clear that。☓朗読で理由(reasons)が地域(regions)になり、浄水場が戦争(war)になった。

豆知識

If this were to fall into the hands of — were to は「万一〜したら」の仮定法。起きる確率の低いことを言う形。fall into the hands of = 〜の手に渡る。a matter of national security = 国家安全保障の問題。

生徒I wish I wrote this answer, you know, that day. My, instead of my elementary school, you know, I will, you know, definitely first, you know, if I wrote this answer. What do you think about this?

ネイティブなら

I wish I had given this answer that day, instead of my elementary-school English. If I had, I'd definitely have passed. What do you think about this?

解説

☓I wish I wrote → I wish I HAD WRITTEN / had given。過去の後悔は had + 過去分詞。☓I will definitely first → I'D definitely HAVE PASSED。

★★2年前の二次で同じお題が出て、小学生の英語で答えて落ちた、と講師に。☓後悔の仮定法が2か所とも現在形(第135夜の should have + 原形と同じ帯)。

先生It's a good answer, to be honest. They covered a lot of uh use a lot of good language and covered a lot of uh yeah, good round, yeah. Um, yes, there was a cyber attack in uh Spain and France. The the strange thing about some of these modern cyber attacks is there's not even a motive. I think like using AI, some bunch of kids can like just do it like a prank. ... They they shut sound, they didn't try to get any ransom money, they didn't try to some give out some for fun, just for fun, you know. But like if they they shut down some supermarket freezers, basically, by doing some hacking and that they they they made the freezers heat up, which caused the fire in some cases, but other than that, all the food in the freezers goes bad, and then they have to throw out all this food. So, it has like a supply chain issue, it obviously impacts the company financially, temporarily insured.

解説

★★★講師の立場3(前半) — 模範解答はいい。だが今のサイバー攻撃には動機すら無い。スペインとフランスで、子どもが AI を使っていたずらで、身代金も要求せず、スーパーの冷凍庫を止めて火事を起こした。

盗む

The strange thing about some of these modern cyber attacks is there's not even a motive.

「〜の妙な所は」= The strange thing about ~ is。do it like a prank = いたずらでやる。ransom money = 身代金。the food goes bad = 腐る。supply chain issue = 供給網の問題。

豆知識

2025〜26年、欧州の小売チェーンへのサイバー攻撃で、冷蔵・冷凍設備の制御系が狙われた事例が報じられた。講師の「動機が無い、子どもが AI で」は講師の見立て。事実として、ランサムウェア(身代金型)ではない破壊型の攻撃が増えているのは、各国のサイバー当局の報告と一致する。

先生But it's like very seems so pointless, but obviously it is preventable, because those private businesses, the government could have invest and make sure that they have the proper safety firewall or whatever it is, or use out of date because all the companies have been so quick to digitalize, but they haven't actually like got the right cyber security in line with their digitalizations. So, when they started their digitalizations as a government or as a private company, they should be advancing their cyber security at the same rate that they're digitalizing so that these things can't happen, because obviously they they do have a big impact like on people's lives, economically, whatever.

解説

★★★講師の立場3(後半) — 無意味だが防げる。デジタル化を急いで、セキュリティを同じ速度で上げなかった。模範解答に無い論。

盗む

They haven't got the right cybersecurity in line with their digitalization. They should be advancing their cybersecurity at the same rate that they're digitalizing.

「〜と足並みを揃えて」= in line with。「同じ速度で」= at the same rate that。pointless but preventable = 無意味だが防げる。out of date = 時代遅れの。二次の具体例に、そのまま使える論。

生徒Wow. Yeah, I think I I I could listen to you, you know, maybe, you know, uh yeah, because I really, you know, maybe, you know, I I don't have say anything. That's the best way to run, because I'm kind of like, you know, but after the what I I I'll steal, you know, both you and this uh model model answers, so. Today, yeah, maybe I will focus on just just taking good bits that you remember from either, I've got seven minutes left, so.

ネイティブなら

I could just listen to you. I don't have to say anything. That's the best way to run this. Afterwards I'll steal from both you and the model answers. Today I'll just take the good bits from either. I've got seven minutes left.

解説

☓I don't have say anything → I don't have TO say anything。☓That's the best way to run → the best way to run THIS。

★★「あなたと模範解答の両方から盗む」— 今夜の方針を2回目。★good bits(いい所)は立った。☓have to の to が落ちた。

生徒Number four, does the study. Ah, but it's it's a good topic. [模範解答4・哲学 — 朗読] Does the study of philosophy have any relevance in today's society? Although many ideas from philosophy come from the ancient world, I think it is still relevant in today's society. One reason is that we need to think about how modern technology and economics will affect our society. If we don't think about the morality and ethics of the things we are creating, it could be extremely dangerous. When we develop things like nuclear weapons or clones, we need to think about how they will be used and the harm they can do. Philosophy can be extremely helpful in this respect. Secondly, I think that there is a lot of ancient wisdom to be found in studying philosophy. Philosophers think about topics like what happiness or justice truly is. Our society is still searching for meaning, and we may need to look to the past in order to move forward. Finally, philosophy teaches us critical thinking. It causes us to question assumptions and look at important issues deeply, helping us to analyze complex problems and challenge biases. These are essential skills in modern life. To sum up, because of the importance of thinking about ethics and morality, its application to modern life, and its usefulness in the development of critical thinking skills, my opinion is that philosophy is definitely still worth studying.

解説

★模範解答4の骨 — Although ~ come from the ancient world, I think it is still relevant / One reason is that / If we don't ~, it could be extremely dangerous / in this respect / Secondly, I think that there is a lot of ~ to be found in / look to the past in order to move forward / Finally, ~ teaches us / To sum up, because of A, B, and C, my opinion is that。盗む句 — question assumptions / challenge biases / essential skills in modern life / worth studying。

豆知識

look TO the past = 過去に目を向ける(助けを求める)。look AT the past = 過去を見る。to だと「頼る」が入る。模範解答は to。

生徒So, I want to show you have you have you watched uh have you seen the movie like Odyssey? Odyssey, uh Christopher Nolan's like this one. ... Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, because yeah, I watched some short clip about it's from, you know, uh poem, right? Ancient. Poem about Homer. Yeah, the Odyssey Homer or something, isn't it? Homer's Odyssey, Homer's. ... And uh yeah, yeah, yeah, I watched this short clip like uh you know, uh a philosophers, like. Studying Homer, talking about how important still its humanities are important passing, so it's kind of like, you know. Reminds me, so I'm joking here. So. What what do you think about this? Maybe you agree with this?

ネイティブなら

Have you seen Christopher Nolan's The Odyssey? It's from an ancient poem by Homer, right? Homer's Odyssey. I watched a short clip of a philosopher talking about Homer, about how the humanities are still important. It reminded me of this topic. What do you think? Do you agree with this?

解説

☓poem about Homer → poem BY Homer。ホメロスについての詩になった。☓how important still its humanities are important → how the humanities are STILL important。important が2回。☓Reminds me → IT REMINDED me。

★★模範解答の直後に、自分の見た物(ノーランの『オデュッセイア』、ホメロスを語る哲学者のクリップ)に話を引き寄せた。講師の『国家』の話は、このフリから出た。☓ホメロス「についての」詩になった。

豆知識

Christopher Nolan の The Odyssey は2026年7月公開。原作はホメロスの叙事詩『オデュッセイア』(紀元前8世紀頃)。by Homer(ホメロスによる)。

先生Ah, I I actually uh read a uh book. A couple of years ago about Greek philosophy, and it covered all the different uh Greek philosophers, but I um I agreed with a lot of what they said in their model answer, actually, to be honest. Because I feel like history is repeating itself, in a way. Those Greek philosophers, like all those years ago, were a lot more advanced and kind of higher-level thinking than some of our academics or most of the academics today, to be honest. So, it's like I think that the world has some kind of strange reset. Where a lot of things are kind of uh a lot of things are like forgotten and they shouldn't be forgotten and we go back.

解説

★★★講師の立場4(前半) — 歴史は繰り返している。ギリシャの哲学者は今の学者の大半より高い所にいた。世界は妙なリセットを経て、忘れてはいけない物を忘れた。

盗む

I feel like history is repeating itself, in a way. The world has had some kind of strange reset.

「歴史は繰り返す」= history is repeating itself(進行形で「今まさに」)。in a way = ある意味。a strange reset = 妙なリセット(文明が一度忘れた、の比喩)。

先生The information is there, like you only have to read these like Greek philosophers' books and you're like, so, wait, in the Republic, he talks about how politicians shouldn't be like making huge amounts of money or something, because it's obviously going to corrupt the system, but it's like even now today they haven't figured out how to prevent that or they haven't made the effort to actually solve something that someone was saying a thousand years ago that they should never do that. Because it just goes against the whole point of being a public servant. Uh and you become self-serving. It's like and even in today's world there isn't like one government that actually operates a republic on that basis, like in every single country in the world all the politicians are raking it in, you know. So, it's like even just one basic, simple principle from ... They haven't, they've not implemented it, they've still not.

解説

★★★講師の立場4(後半) — プラトンの『国家』は、政治家が儲けると仕組みが腐ると書いた。2千年後、どの国も実装していない。公僕(public servant)が self-serving になり、全員が raking it in(かき集めている)。第136夜の line their pockets、第137夜の lining their pockets の、講師版。

盗む

It goes against the whole point of being a public servant. All the politicians are raking it in.

「〜の趣旨に反する」= go against the whole point of。「私腹を肥やす」= rake it in(熊手でかき集める)。録音では reining it in と聞こえるが、文脈は raking it in。public servant ↔ self-serving の対。

豆知識

プラトン『国家』(紀元前375年頃)の守護者(統治者)は私有財産を持たない。統治者が富を求めると国が腐る、という論。講師の「千年前」は、実際は約2400年前。

生徒Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. ... Yeah, thank you. Wow, so so many I I kind of like uh looking forward to next class, maybe uh your comments and uh model answers, I'm sure I will maybe on the I wish I will I hope I will be in the office and uh share screen and uh I will show you results. Definitely would be wonderful. But first, you know, I want to finish because. Finally, five.

ネイティブなら

Thank you. I'm looking forward to the next class. I hope I'll be in the office so I can share my screen and show you the results, with your comments and the model answers. That'd be wonderful. But first, let me finish. Number five.

解説

☓I wish I will → I HOPE I will。wish の後ろは仮定法、hope の後ろは未来。本人が hope に言い直した。

★★次回の予告 — オフィスから画面共有で「結果」を見せる。第138夜の写真の次は、画面共有。本人は検死を講師に見せる形式を続けるつもりでいる。★I wish → I hope と自分で直した。

生徒[模範解答5・自然保護 — 朗読] Agree or disagree: Wealthy countries should fund efforts to preserve natural areas around the world. I believe wealthy countries should definitely fund efforts to preserve natural areas around the world. I will discuss this issue from the perspectives of making up for past actions and the interconnectedness of nature and economics. First, on the way to becoming wealthy, developed countries paid almost no attention to the environment. They prioritized economic growth over environmental protection, which resulted in severe pollution and habitat destruction. Therefore, they now have an obligation to make up for their past actions by supporting global environmental preservation. Another reason is that these days, we are discovering a lot about how interconnected everything in nature is. For instance, although the Amazon rainforest is on the other side of the world from Japan, it has a huge effect on us. Destroying it will worsen global warming, so it is definitely worth the price of preserving it. Finally, there is the economic impact of environmental destruction. For example, damage to coral reefs and the marine ecosystem can seriously reduce fish populations. Since fishing is an important part of Japan's economy, it makes good financial sense to spend money on protecting marine environments. In my opinion, for the reasons I've just mentioned, wealthy countries cannot afford not to fund efforts to preserve natural areas around the world.

ネイティブなら

(朗読) definitely worth the price / fish populations / an important part of Japan's economy

解説

☓differently worth the price → DEFINITELY。第137夜の very differently(definitely)と同じ1音。☓fish operations → fish POPULATIONS。☓an important product of → an important PART of。

★模範解答5の骨 — I will discuss this issue from the perspectives of A and B / First, on the way to ~ / They prioritized A over B, which resulted in / Therefore, they now have an obligation to / Another reason is that / For instance / Finally, there is the economic impact of / Since ~, it makes good financial sense to / In my opinion, for the reasons I've just mentioned, ~ cannot afford not to。盗む句 — make up for past actions / interconnectedness / prioritize A over B / habitat destruction / worth the price / makes good financial sense / cannot afford not to。☓definitely は2夜連続で differently。

豆知識

cannot afford not to = 〜しないわけにはいかない(二重否定で義務)。afford は金銭だけでなく「余裕がある」。模範解答の締めの1文。

先生Mm. Yeah, it's a debatable one, because obviously. If if you believe I kind of disagree with this, because I think that even regardless of how developed a country is, what they're saying is how wealthy the economy is, that like all of the economies are intertwined based on what they just said, right? That that industrialization and those advancements in those rich countries have also benefited those other countries. Like it's not like those countries are not using electricity. If they have access to it, they'll use it too, and they'll also benefit from it. So, all of this advancement and development, even if they have done it while damaging the environment while doing it. Or I don't know if they've done it, they they may have been profiteering or trying to, but in some ways that's also benefiting humanity.

解説

★★★講師の立場5(前半) — 反対。経済は絡み合っていて、先進国の産業化は他国にも恩恵をもたらした。電気を使わない国は無い。模範解答の「償い」を正面から外した。

盗む

I kind of disagree with this. Regardless of how developed a country is, all of the economies are intertwined.

「どれだけ〜であろうと」= regardless of how + 形容詞。「絡み合っている」= intertwined。it's a debatable one = 議論の分かれる題。profiteering = 暴利をむさぼる。

先生Yeah, but the point of a sovereign nation is like if if if if who are like Britain to go over to another country and start messing with their environment, like that's their sovereign country, if you get what I mean. You know? Like that that could cause even more problems. You know, with like big non-governmental organizations, you know, and then nobody knows where the money goes, you know, and it's like, are they actually causing more problems or are they just wasting the money or not actually using it. Like I would say that each sovereign country should try and protect the environment, and I think they do. Because we have like national parks and stuff, right? We have like protected species, protected land, protected environment, at least here in the EU, there's so much regulation about what you can do with the land.

解説

★★★講師の立場5(後半) — 主権国家の環境に英国が口を出すのは余計な問題を生む。NGO の金は行方不明。各国が自分で守るべきで、EU には規制が十分ある。ここで講師の居場所が出た — here in the EU。

盗む

Nobody knows where the money goes.

「金の行方が分からない」= nobody knows where the money goes。NGO・税金・寄付の話の定型。messing with = 余計な手を出す。sovereign nation = 主権国家。if you get what I mean = 言いたいこと分かるよね。

生徒I don't yeah, yeah, I'm kind of disagree with what they're doing in EU, it's so much progressive, I think, you know, it's not. It's so much to go to the far left. And uh yeah, so there's a you have to strike a balance, you know, there's no like uh the the truth is in the middle always, so I don't like how you would walk environment and.

ネイティブなら

I kind of disagree with what they're doing in the EU. It's too progressive. It's gone too far to the left. You have to strike a balance. The truth is always in the middle.

解説

☓I'm kind of disagree → I kind of DISAGREE。前夜の宿題①、2回目の FAILED。講師が10秒前に I kind of disagree と正しく言っている。☓it's so much progressive → it's TOO progressive。形容詞の前に so much は置けない(第137夜の very の宿題と同じ帯)。☓in EU → in THE EU。

★★★封印を破った1段落。「今日は意見を言わない」と宣言した男が、5題目で EU は左に行きすぎだと言い、strike a balance で締めた。★第137夜に make a balance と崩れた定型が、9日後に strike で立った。★the truth is in the middle always も立った。☓I'm kind of disagree — 講師の I kind of disagree を10秒後に be 付きで復唱した。

先生Yeah. Some of those environmental activists, as an example, like they they they they say like. It's it like you said, it's out of balance, because they want they like don't want people to have cheap electricity, but like if people don't people don't have cheap electricity, they'll die out. They're like, we they're like, we don't we don't mind. But it's like, but is the planet actually going to die? I don't think it is, so it's like there's a strange it definitely needs to be balanced, right, and looking at both.

解説

★講師は男の balance を受けた — 活動家は安い電気を人に与えたくない。電気が無ければ人は死ぬ。地球は死なない。両方を見ろ。

盗む

It's out of balance. It definitely needs to be balanced, looking at both sides.

「偏っている」= out of balance。「両方を見る」= looking at both sides。男の strike a balance を講師が balanced で返した。die out = 絶滅する。

生徒It needs to be balanced, yeah. Yeah. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Yeah, I'm so excited. Next, but maybe this, you know, uh next time on on online office, I will show the results in an interesting way. You'll be surprised.

ネイティブなら

It needs to be balanced, yeah. I'm so excited. Next time, from my office online, I'll show you the results in an interesting way. You'll be surprised.

解説

☓on online office → FROM my office, ONLINE。

★終わり — 「次回、結果を面白い形で見せる。驚くよ」。講師の前で AI を第3の聞き手に指名した夜の、締めの予告。この検死が、その「結果」である。

トレーニング 0/32 ・ミス 17